Reyelts V Lon Smith Roofing

The lon smith appellants ignore the language of their roof repair contract with the appellees gerald and beatriz reyelts the reyelts which specifically authorize d lon smith roofing and construction lsrc to pursue homeowner s best interest for all repairs at a price agreeable to the insurance company and lsrc the contract further stated that t he final price agreed to between the insurance company and lsrc shall be the final contract price in other.

Reyelts v lon smith roofing.

Lon smith installed the new roof but lon smith never made contact with the couple s insurance company. Due to her age and physical limitations beatriz could not and thus did not climb onto the roof to inspect the lon smith defendants work. Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm. A decision adverse to lon smith roofing could have widespread ramifications for all texas contractors who attempt to negotiate insurance claims.

Due to her age and physical limitations beatriz could not and thus did not climb onto the roof to inspect the lon smith defendants work. The reyelts relied upon the lon smith defendants representations that the work the lon smith defendants promised to perform and allegedly performed was actually performed. Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm. The problems for lon smith roofing started with the.

Lon smith roofing and construction et al. The lon smith appellants ignore the language of their roof repair contract with the appelleesgerald and beatriz reyelts the reyelts whichspecifically authorize d lon smith roofing and construction lsrc to pursue homeowner s best interest for all repairs at a price agreeable to the insurance company and lsrc. The reyeltses filed suit against lon smith associates inc. A decision adverse to lon smith roofing could have widespread ramifications for all texas contractors who attempt to negotiate insurance claims.

The problems for lon smith roofing started with the 2013 ruling in reyelts v. The reyelts relied upon the lon smith defendants representations that the work the lon smith defendants promised to perform and allegedly performed was actually performed. S soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally visited the homeowners offering their roofing services including an assessment of the hail damage and assistance with the insurance claim.